So you’ve constructed a roadmap and it has ‘executed the job’ for some time however you now really feel the necessity to push it just a little bit additional. Here’s a record of 17 questions that may allow you to enhance it step-by-step.

1. Is the product imaginative and prescient written on prime of the roadmap? If not, remind it to the groups.
2. Does everybody actually have entry to the roadmap? Or is it buried in a 20-pages doc someplace on the backside of a file listing not everybody has entry to? Transfer it to an apparent and accessible place.
3. Are all of the contributors to the roadmap conscious that they shall contribute? If not, schedule an onboarding session with them asap.
4. Does the sponsor know tips on how to contribute to the roadmap? If not, clarify your expectations (trace: their job is to make choices) and the way the roadmap works.
5. Is the roadmapping device accessible (in each sense of the phrase)? Higher use an excel file (all people is aware of excel) than a elaborate device half the workforce don’t get (Notion as an example is a elaborate device that most individuals don’t know tips on how to use). Select properly.
6. Have you ever materialised the time spent engaged on work? Duties don’t magically change from “todo” to “doing”, there’s a time when individuals have to consider tips on how to do the work. They assume, replicate, talk about, prototype, learn docs, take a look at completely different hypotheses, and so on. Use a hillchart diagram to visualise that, it’s among the best instruments ever invented.
7. Are the outcomes clearly said? Most roadmaps are full of options however no outcomes. Options lists make groups very task-focused and never goal-oriented. Be certain the outcomes and advantages (what the person can do out of the options) are clearly said.
8. Do you might have KPIs tied to these outcomes and are they up to date at every roadmapping session? If not, you aren’t measuring the progress made, however merely monitoring a schedule.
9. Do you utilize prioritisation instruments to kind issues out within the roadmap and say No to pointless and ineffective work? If not, think about easy instruments like MOSCOW or RICE to get began, or some other matrixes to prioritise issues.
10. Is the roadmap alive and up to date at the very least each month? If not, you’re most likely taking a look at a retro planning nobody needs to replace fairly than at a roadmap.
11. Does the granularity of roadmap objects match the frequency of replace? (frequent replace, small objects — much less frequent updates, greater objects)
12. Are managers and stakeholders glad with the roadmap format? In any other case they received’t contribute.
13. Are supply groups glad with the roadmap’s format? In any other case they received’t perceive it.
14. Is it simple to determine potential dangers, useless ends and dependencies when reviewing the roadmap? If not, it is very important tackle these points as they will significantly influence the success of the product.
15. Do the present enterprise challenges seem clearly? This helps groups perceive what’s at stake, the large image and what they’re contributing to.
16. Does your roadmap encourage before everything value-based choices and prioritisation? If not, think about engaged on an ACID take a look at.
17. Do you’re employed on the three timeframes of the product : quick, medium and long run? If not, think about the “now / subsequent / later” roadmap format